Duval v. Louisiana

Supreme Court

Duval v. Louisiana

239 U.S. 626, 36 S. Ct. 162, 60 L. Ed. 474, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1409

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 25, 1915·No. No. 223·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2), 212 U. S. 112, 118; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31; (2) Northern Pacific Railroad v. Herbert, 116 U. S. 642; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U. S. 68; Howard v. Kentucky, 200 U. S. 164.

Mr. R. G. Pleasant and Mr. Daniel Wendling for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2), 212 U. S. 112, 118; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31; (2) Northern Pacific Railroad v. Herbert, 116 U. S. 642; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U. S. 68; Howard v. Kentucky, 200 U. S. 164.

Mr. R. G. Pleasant and Mr. Daniel Wendling for the defendant in error.

Duval v. Louisiana, 239 U.S. 626, 36 S. Ct. 162, 60 L. Ed. 474, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1409 (1915).

Pincite

239 U.S. 626 (Duval v. Louisiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related