Duval v. Gleason
This text of 41 F.3d 1513 (Duval v. Gleason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Eugene F. DUVAL, D'Loris J. Giavia, Edward Giavia, Marilyn
F. Greathouse, Jean Senour and Robert M.
Greathouse, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Alfred M. GLEASON, et al., Defendants,
and
Hallwood Realty Corporation and Hallwood Realty Partners,
L.P., Appellants.
No. 93-16919.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 8, 1994.*
Decided Nov. 10, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CV-90-00242-CAL; Charles A. Legge, District Judge, Presiding.
N.D.Cal., 1991 WL 214251.
DISMISSED.
BEFORE: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON AND CANBY, CIRCUIT JUDGES.
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).
The parties will bear their own costs on appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 F.3d 1513, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38994, 1994 WL 630062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duval-v-gleason-ca9-1994.