Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Duty v. State

Duty v. State

886 S.W.2d 875, 318 Ark. 686, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 627
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 14, 1994·No. CR 94-1153·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, James A. Duty, by his attorney, Robert C. Harder, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duty v. State, 886 S.W.2d 875, 318 Ark. 686, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 627 (Ark. 1994).

886 S.W.2d 875 (Duty v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Harkness v. State
572 S.W.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1978)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)