Duty, P., etc. v. Toyota Advanced Logistics
This text of Duty, P., etc. v. Toyota Advanced Logistics (Duty, P., etc. v. Toyota Advanced Logistics) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
PATRICIA DUTY AND DEBRA MILLER, : No. 529 EAL 2021 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF : JENNIFER WRIGHT, : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court Petitioners : : : v. : : : TOYOTA ADVANCED LOGISTICS, : BASTIAN SOLUTIONS, PEACH STATE : INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES, TOYORA : INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMAN MFG. INC., : RAYMOND CORPORATION, RAYMOND- : MUSCATINE, INC., LIFT, INC., PACIFIC : RIM CAPITAL INC., ALEJANDRO SACHEZ : BELTRAN, HAMILTON CASTER, TOYOTA : MOTOR CORP., TOYOTA INDUSTRIES, : CORP., TOYOTA FORKLIFTS, TOYOTA : MATERIAL HANDLING USA, INC., : TOYOTA INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Duty, P., etc. v. Toyota Advanced Logistics, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duty-p-etc-v-toyota-advanced-logistics-pa-2022.