Duty, P., etc. v. Toyota Advanced Logistics

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 16, 2022·No. 529 EAL 2021·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

PATRICIA DUTY AND DEBRA MILLER, : No. 529 EAL 2021 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF : JENNIFER WRIGHT, : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court Petitioners :

: :

v. :

: :

TOYOTA ADVANCED LOGISTICS, : BASTIAN SOLUTIONS, PEACH STATE : INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES, TOYORA : INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMAN MFG. INC., : RAYMOND CORPORATION, RAYMOND- : MUSCATINE, INC., LIFT, INC., PACIFIC : RIM CAPITAL INC., ALEJANDRO SACHEZ : BELTRAN, HAMILTON CASTER, TOYOTA : MOTOR CORP., TOYOTA INDUSTRIES, : CORP., TOYOTA FORKLIFTS, TOYOTA : MATERIAL HANDLING USA, INC., : TOYOTA INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duty, P., etc. v. Toyota Advanced Logistics, (Pa. 2022).

Duty, P., etc. v. Toyota Advanced Logistics (Duty, P., etc. v. Toyota Advanced Logistics) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.