Dutton v. United States

6 Ct. Cust. 460, 1915 WL 20700, 1915 CCPA LEXIS 125
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedDecember 6, 1915
DocketNo. 1538
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 Ct. Cust. 460 (Dutton v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dutton v. United States, 6 Ct. Cust. 460, 1915 WL 20700, 1915 CCPA LEXIS 125 (ccpa 1915).

Opinion

Martin, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The merchandise in this case consists of books which were imported under the tariff act of 1913 and which were assessed with duty at the rate of 15 per cent ad valorem under the provision for “ books not specially provided for ” contained in paragraph 329 of the act.

The importers protested against the assessment, claiming free entry for the merchandise under the provision for all textbooks used in schools and other educational institutions,” in paragraph 426 of the same act.

The protest was overruled by the Board of General Appraisers, and the importers now appeal.

The following is a copy of the two paragraphs which thus stand in competition in this case:

329. Books of all kinds, bound or unbound, including blank books, slate books and pamphlets, engravings, photographs, etchings, maps, charts, music in books or sheets, and printed matter, all the foregoing, and not specially provided for in this section, 15 per centum ad valorem. * * *
426. (Free list) Books and pamphlets printed wholly or chiefly in languages other than English; also books and music, in raised print, used exclusively by the blind, and all textbooks used in schools and other educational institutions;

The sole question in the present case is whether the imported books are “textbooks used in schools and other educational institutions,” for if they are within that description they would be entitled to free entry.

The books before the court consist of 150 titles of a series known as “ Everyman’s Library,” published by appellants, and intended to include when completed all of the world’s classics in literature. The series was begun eight years ago and now contains about 700 titles. It is expected to embrace 1,000 titles when finally completed.

The following extract from the testimony of witness John Macrae, vice president of the appellant company, briefly sets out the origin and character of the series:

* * * I arranged for the series. If you would like, I will make a little statement of how J. M. Dent & Sons and ourselves work together. We worked together about two years in bringing together and making practical the scheme of issuing this “ Everyman’s Library ” in a form that would be acceptable for general reading and educational purposes. The problem was to produce the [462]*462best literature oí the world in a form that appealed to the aesthetic sense of a man or woman but left the booh at a price that would make it possible for every man or woman to buy it. “ Everyman’s,” the title, really arose from that idea. Many of the books have been edited by men of distinction in various branches of learning and walks of life. For instance, the speeches of Lincoln were edited by the late ambassador from England, Mr. Tames Bryce. Introductions have been written by professors of the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard, Yale, Wellesley, and other great institutions.

The following copy of a prospectus issued by appellants will further illustrate the character of the series:

The aim and scope of the series. — “ The true university in these days,” said Carlyle, “is a collection of books.” The-main idea of this new series is to make it easy for everyone to obtain such a collection and get at small cost all that is good, all that has worn well in English literature. It will not offer only the classic authors, it will reprint the Victorians with the Elizabethans, comparatively new authors with the old famous ones, and books for pure pleasure as well as for wisdom and knowledge. Arranged in sections, as of history, philosophy, belles lettres, and so forth, it will make clear the relations of one kind of -book to another, show the debt of a romance like “ Ivanhoe ” to' a romantic historian like Froissart, or set the poets side by side with a book of creative criticism like Coleridge’s “ Biographia Literaria.” Thus for a small amount the reader may have a whole bookshelf of the immortals.

The plan thus conceived has been largely carried out. “ Everyman’s Library” embraces the world’s classical literature in fiction poetry, history, biography, economics, essays, children’s books, etc., and in all about 700,000 volumes of its 700 or more titles are now imported each year. These are sold in part to the general book trade in this country, in part to bookstores which deal especially with students at educational institutions, and in part directly to such institutions themselves. The testimony is not quite clear concerning the number of books sold to the general trade as compared with those sold for use in educational institutions, but while the latter trade is large yet it does not appear to furnish the major market for the publications.

By stipulation between counsel seven exhibits have been filed as representative of the 150 titles now in question, and the argument upon both sides assumes that these titles are fairly representative of the entire series'. Accordingly, the testimony and the briefs treat the present issue somewhat as if it involved the entire library, although in fact only 150 titles of the series are now under protest.

The seven exhibits which are submitted as representative of the importations are Motley’s Dutch Republic, three volumes; Machiavelli’s Prince, one volume; The Federalist, one volume; Shelley’s Complete Poems, two volumes; Marcus Aurelius, one volume; Adam Bede, one volume; and Browning’s Poems, two volumes.

The present volumes are of uniform size, are printed in English, in clear type, upon a good quality of paper, and are compact and con[463]*463venient for handling. They sell at prices ranging from 35 to 70 cents per volume. The volumes in evidence are plainly bound .in colored cloth, but the series at large includes four styles of binding, viz, cloth, leather, quarter pigskin, and fortified library.

It appears that many titles from “ Everyman’s ” series are sold to students and their teachers for use in educational institutions. These, however, are not books which undertake to set out in their test the facts or principles of any branch of learning as a means of instruction therein, but are simply famous books which are accepted as masterpieces in poetry, fiction, or other form of literature, and serve as models or illustrative standards in the classroom study of general literature as a branch of learning.

In the testimony of Mr. Macrae the following books of the series are mentioned as having been sold by appellants to educational institutions, viz: “Ivanhoe,” “Loma Doone,” “Last of the Mohicans,” “ Kenilworth,” “ Conquest of Granada,” “ Pathfinder,” “ Oliver Twist,” “Mill on the Floss,” “Old Mortality,” “Journal of the Plague Year,” Shakespeare’s Comedies, “Faust,” “The Aeneid,” Strickland’s “ Life of Queen Elizabeth,” Southey’s “ Life of Nelson,” White’s “Natural History of Selburne,” Tyndall’s “Glaciers of the Alps,” Lockhart’s “Life of Scott,” Lincoln’s Speeches, “Voyage of the Beagle,” “ Ethics of the Dust,” and “ Heroes and Hero Worship.” The record also contains letters from prominent educators of various parts of the country, evidencing the purchase by them of numerous other titles of the library. It is said that many of the works just referred to have been used by teachers and students as class books as well as for supplementary reading in the study of literature.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. United States
14 Ct. Cust. 96 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)
United States v. Petry Co.
11 Ct. Cust. 240 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1922)
United States v. Tice & Lynch
10 Ct. Cust. 198 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1920)
McLaughlin v. United States
10 Ct. Cust. 24 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ct. Cust. 460, 1915 WL 20700, 1915 CCPA LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dutton-v-united-states-ccpa-1915.