Dutton v. Sikorsky Aircraft

24 F.R.D. 514, 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4257
District Court, D. Connecticut·Decided May 19, 1959·No. Civ. A. No. 7623·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

J. JOSEPH SMITH, Chief Judge.

This is an action in two counts brought by the representative of the estate of a marine killed in the crash in Georgia of a helicopter manufactured and sold by [515] defendant in Connecticut. The first count sounds in negligence, the second in breach of warranty. Defendant moves under Rule 12(b), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S. C.A., to dismiss the second count on two grounds, lack of privity essential under Connecticut law, and failure of the Georgia Wrongful Death Act to provide recovery for death caused by breach of warranty.

The first ground is well taken. Borucki v. MacKenzie Bros. Co., 1938, 125 Conn. 92, 3 A.2d 224; Tralli v. Triple X Stores, 1954, 19 Conn.Sup. 293, 112 A.2d 507; Hermanson v. Hermanson, 1954, 19 Conn.Sup. 479, 117 A.2d 840; Barrett v. Air Reduction Co., 1955, 19 Conn.Sup. 500, 118 A.2d 629.

The second ground is also well taken. The Georgia Wrongful Death Statute confines recovery to cases where the death is caused by crime or criminal or other negligence. Ga.Code § 105-1301.

The motion to dismiss the second count for failure to state a claim on which' relief can be granted is granted. The second count is ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dutton v. Sikorsky Aircraft, 24 F.R.D. 514, 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4257 (D. Conn. 1959).

24 F.R.D. 514 (Dutton v. Sikorsky Aircraft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hinton v. Republic Aviation Corporation
180 F. Supp. 31 (S.D. New York, 1959)