Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Dutton v. Alford

Dutton v. Alford

798 So. 2d 812, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15130, 2001 WL 1297661
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 2001
DocketNo. 1D99-4857
StatusPublished

This text of 798 So. 2d 812 (Dutton v. Alford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dutton v. Alford, 798 So. 2d 812, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15130, 2001 WL 1297661 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Bryan v. Dugger, 641 So.2d 61, 65 (Fla.1994); Gray v. Wainwright, 442 So.2d 312, 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (“Habeas corpus is not a substitute for direct appeal. Hargrave v. Wainwright, 388 So.2d 1021 (Fla.1980).”).

ALLEN, C.J., BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hargrave v. Wainwright
388 So. 2d 1021 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Bryan v. Dugger
641 So. 2d 61 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Gray v. Wainwright
442 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
798 So. 2d 812, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15130, 2001 WL 1297661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dutton-v-alford-fladistctapp-2001.