Dutta v. Big River Steel LLC
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
ANANYA DUTTA PLAINTIFF
No. 3:22-cv-95-DPM
BIG RIVER STEEL, LLC DEFENDANT ORDER Status report, Doc. 22, appreciated. Joint motion, Doc. 20, granted. The proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC, 927 F.3d 1024, 1027 (8th Cir. 2019); Melgar v. OK Foods, 902 F.3d 775, 779 (8th Cir. 2018). It reflepcts a good-faith compromise of a bona fide wages dispute. And the attorney’s fee was negotiated after the merits were resolved separately. Compare Vines v. Welspun Pipes Inc., 2021 WL 3640219, at *3 (8th Cir. 2021). The Court will dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice and retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement. So Ordered. OFiiprstell D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge AZ Marth L043
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dutta v. Big River Steel LLC (Dutta v. Big River Steel LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.