Dutta Seshachalam v. Creighton University School of Medicine

549 F.2d 79
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 1977
Docket76-1949
StatusPublished

This text of 549 F.2d 79 (Dutta Seshachalam v. Creighton University School of Medicine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dutta Seshachalam v. Creighton University School of Medicine, 549 F.2d 79 (8th Cir. 1977).

Opinion

ORDER

In our opinion filed December 13, 1976, we remanded this case to the district court to give appellant the opportunity to request that the district court accept nunc pro tunc the notice of appeal filed on October 1, 1976, on grounds of excusable neglect. We further indicated: “Until such determination, action on the motion to dismiss will be deferred.”

We have now received the district court’s determination that it “cannot conclude that the plaintiff’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal constituted excusable neglect.” We have received what has been designated “Notice of Appeal” from the foregoing district court’s order. Nevertheless, it is our view that under the circumstances this appeal in its entirety must be dismissed without further review. Stirling v. Chemical Bank, 511 F.2d 1030, 1032-33 (2d Cir. 1975); Evans v. Jones, 366 F.2d 772 (4th Cir. 1966).

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Jones
366 F.2d 772 (Fourth Circuit, 1966)
Stirling v. Chemical Bank
511 F.2d 1030 (Second Circuit, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
549 F.2d 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dutta-seshachalam-v-creighton-university-school-of-medicine-ca8-1977.