Dutka v. Dutka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dutka v. Dutka

67 A.D.2d 901, 412 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10669

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 901 (Dutka v. Dutka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dutka v. Dutka, 67 A.D.2d 901, 412 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for divorce, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 13, 1978, as (1) denied her requests for exclusive possession of the marital home, an order of protection and an interim counsel fee, and (2) awarded her only $300 per week as temporary alimony. Order modified, by deleting therefrom the provision which awarded plaintiff $300 per week as temporary alimony, and substituting therefor a provision awarding plaintiff $500 per week as temporary alimony. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. The temporary alimony was inadequate to the extent indicated herein. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for divorce, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 13, 1978, as (1) denied her requests for exclusive possession of the marital home, an order of protection and an interim counsel fee, and (2) awarded her only $300 per week as temporary alimony. Order modified, by deleting therefrom the provision which awarded plaintiff $300 per week as temporary alimony, and substituting therefor a provision awarding plaintiff $500 per week as temporary alimony. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. The temporary alimony was inadequate to the extent indicated herein. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 901, 412 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dutka-v-dutka-nyappdiv-1979.