Dutil v. Mayette

395 F. Supp. 922
CourtDistrict Court, D. Vermont
DecidedFebruary 4, 1975
DocketCiv. No. 73-138
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 395 F. Supp. 922 (Dutil v. Mayette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dutil v. Mayette, 395 F. Supp. 922 (D. Vt. 1975).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HOLDEN, District Judge.

The defendant has moved to dismiss this wrongful death action (14 V.S.A. §§, 1491, 1492) on two grounds: (1) the action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations and (2) the plaintiff, by failing to procure ancillary letters of administration in Vermont, lacks capacity to bring this suit. The Court’s finding that the plaintiff does lack capacity to bring this suit makes it unnecessary to reach the statute of limitations issue.

At the hearing on January 3, 1975 on these two affirmative defenses, plaintiff’s counsel conceded that the plaintiff administratrix had not procured ancillary letters of administration in Vermont. Without the authorization of ancillary letters of administration issued in Vermont, a plaintiff administratrix appointed in a foreign jurisdiction lacks capacity to maintain a wrongful death action in this state. Accordingly, the complaint must be dismissed. Weinstein v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, 358 F.Supp. 297 (D.Vt.1972).

By dismissing this complaint for lack of capacity, the Court leaves the novel and unsettled questions of recent Vermont statutory changes attending the limitations of actions to the state courts.1

It is ordered:

That the defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dutil v. Mayette
517 F.2d 936 (Second Circuit, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
395 F. Supp. 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dutil-v-mayette-vtd-1975.