Dutchess County Pharmaceutical Society v. State

346 N.E.2d 548, 38 N.Y.2d 887, 382 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2331
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 12, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 346 N.E.2d 548 (Dutchess County Pharmaceutical Society v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dutchess County Pharmaceutical Society v. State, 346 N.E.2d 548, 38 N.Y.2d 887, 382 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2331 (N.Y. 1976).

Opinion

Memorandum. The order should be affirmed.

Section 6826 of the Education Law, in providing access to information about the cdst of prescription drugs by requiring pharmacies to post their current selling prices of the 150 such drugs which are "most frequently prescribed * * * together with their usual dosages” (Education Law, § 6826, subd 2), as set out on a list required to be prepared by the State Board of Pharmacy, is within the permissible scope of the State’s power to regulate drug stores (see Le Drugstore Etats Unis v New York State Bd. of Pharmacy, 33 NY2d 298, 302). Nor is it unconstitutional either for vagueness or for delegation of power to the board to draw up the list in accordance with the standards set out by the statute (cf. Urowsky v Board of Regents, 38 NY2d 364, 371).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
346 N.E.2d 548, 38 N.Y.2d 887, 382 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dutchess-county-pharmaceutical-society-v-state-ny-1976.