Dutcher v. Jackson

D.C. Circuit

Dutcher v. Jackson

269 F. 688, 50 App. D.C. 172, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2329

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 3, 1921

DocketNo. 1329

StatusPublished

This text of 269 F. 688 (Dutcher v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dutcher v. Jackson, 269 F. 688, 50 App. D.C. 172, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2329 (D.C. Cir. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

This in an interference proceeding in which priority was awarded by the Commissioner of Patents to the senior party. The invention relates to railway signal torpedoes and the controversy turns on a question of fact. Each of the tribunals of the Patent Office decided in favor of Jackson. We have examined the record and are unable to say that they were clearly wrong. In view of this, the decision of the Commissioner must be, and it is, affirmed. In re Barratt, 11 App. D. C. 177; Creveling v. Jepson, 47 App. D. C. 597; Reid et al. v. Kitselman (D. C.) 266 Fed. 255 ; Lindmark v. Hodgkinson, 31 App. D. C. 612.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

This in an interference proceeding in which priority was awarded by the Commissioner of Patents to the senior party. The invention relates to railway signal torpedoes and the controversy turns on a question of fact. Each of the tribunals of the Patent Office decided in favor of Jackson. We have examined the record and are unable to say that they were clearly wrong. In view of this, the decision of the Commissioner must be, and it is, affirmed. In re Barratt, 11 App. D. C. 177; Creveling v. Jepson, 47 App. D. C. 597; Reid et al. v. Kitselman (D. C.) 266 Fed. 255 ; Lindmark v. Hodgkinson, 31 App. D. C. 612.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 F. 688, 50 App. D.C. 172, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dutcher-v-jackson-cadc-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack