Dutch Trading Corp. v. Centennial Insurance

39 A.D.2d 691, 332 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4524
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 1972·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York [692] County, entered November 26, 1971, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion to produce certain persons and records for examination denied. The motion was made and granted pursuant to CPLR 3101, subd. [a], par. [1]: “ agent or employee of a party ”. The prospective witnesses were neither, but independent adjusters. This disposition is without prejudice to proper application under subdivision (4), which requires a showing of “adequate special circumstances.” Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, McNally, Eager and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dutch Trading Corp. v. Centennial Insurance, 39 A.D.2d 691, 332 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

39 A.D.2d 691 (Dutch Trading Corp. v. Centennial Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related