Dutch Trading Corp. v. Centennial Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dutch Trading Corp. v. Centennial Insurance

39 A.D.2d 691, 332 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4524

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 A.D.2d 691 (Dutch Trading Corp. v. Centennial Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dutch Trading Corp. v. Centennial Insurance, 39 A.D.2d 691, 332 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York [692]*692County, entered November 26, 1971, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion to produce certain persons and records for examination denied. The motion was made and granted pursuant to CPLR 3101, subd. [a], par. [1]: “ agent or employee of a party ”. The prospective witnesses were neither, but independent adjusters. This disposition is without prejudice to proper application under subdivision (4), which requires a showing of “adequate special circumstances.” Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, McNally, Eager and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York [692]*692County, entered November 26, 1971, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion to produce certain persons and records for examination denied. The motion was made and granted pursuant to CPLR 3101, subd. [a], par. [1]: “ agent or employee of a party ”. The prospective witnesses were neither, but independent adjusters. This disposition is without prejudice to proper application under subdivision (4), which requires a showing of “adequate special circumstances.” Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, McNally, Eager and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 691, 332 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dutch-trading-corp-v-centennial-insurance-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack