Dustrude Case
This text of 182 N.E.2d 487 (Dustrude Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree affirmed. The Industrial Accident Board found (a) that the claimant, Dustrude, the operator of a tractor-drawn trailer, was an employee of the uninsured “owner-operator,” Leighton; and (b) that Leighton was, as to the insured carrier and trailer owner, Chicago Express, Inc., an independent contractor under a “trip lease” arrangement. See American Trucking Assns. Inc. v. United States, 344 U. S. 298, 302-306. The findings were not without evidential support and were not tainted by error of law. Van Bibber’s Case, 343 Mass. 443, 447. They are determinative of the ease. Costs of this appeal may be allowed by the single justice under G. L. c. 152, § 11A.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 N.E.2d 487, 344 Mass. 752, 1962 Mass. LEXIS 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dustrude-case-mass-1962.