Dustin Merle Whaley v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 16, 2021
Docket07-21-00132-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Dustin Merle Whaley v. the State of Texas (Dustin Merle Whaley v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dustin Merle Whaley v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________

No. 07-21-00132-CR ________________________

DUSTIN MERLE WHALEY, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 47th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 70,323-A; Honorable Dan L. Schaap, Presiding

June 16, 2021

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.

Pursuant to an open plea of guilty, Appellant, Dustin Merle Whaley, was convicted

of evading arrest with a vehicle 1 and sentenced to six years confinement. We affirmed

his conviction in Whaley v. State, No. 07-16-00126-CR, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 5612, at

*7 (Tex. App.—Amarillo July 24, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.04(b)(2)(A) (West 2017). On June 8, 2021, Appellant filed a notice with this court requesting a new appeal and the

appointment appellate counsel. We dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant was sentenced on March 22, 2016. Because Appellant timely filed a

motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due within ninety days after sentence was

imposed, i.e., by June 20, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Appellant filed the instant

notice of appeal on June 8, 2021. Because the timely filing of a written notice of appeal

is a jurisdictional prerequisite to hearing an appeal, we have no option but to dismiss the

untimely appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2012).

Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s request for appointed counsel and dismiss this

appeal. 2

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

2 In his notice of appeal, Appellant states that he previously received ineffective assistance of

appellate counsel and, therefore, seeks a new appeal. Although this court has no authority to grant such a request, Appellant may be entitled to relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo, Ex Parte Mario Amaro
369 S.W.3d 196 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dustin Merle Whaley v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dustin-merle-whaley-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.