Dustin Lee Allen v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 24, 2007·No. 07-06-00459-CR·Published

Opinion

NO. 07-06-0457-CR 07-06-0458-CR 07-06-0459-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 24, 2007 ______________________________

DUSTIN LEE ALLEN, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 49,984-D, 49,985-D, 53,537-D; HONORABLE DON R. EMERSON, JUDGE _______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant, Dustin Lee Allen, seeks appeal of his conviction in three cases. We

abate and remand for further proceedings.

In each case, appellant’s notice of appeal was presented to the trial court and

signed by appellant’s attorney, Timothy Pirtle. Since that time, our court has had no further

communication from appellant. Appellant has failed to file an adequate docketing

statement as required under Rule 32.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Further, the trial clerk’s office and the court reporter have both requested extensions of

time for filing of their respective records citing appellant’s failure to make a request for the

record or payment arrangements. 1 See TEX . R. APP. P. 34.5(b)(2), 34.6(b)(1), 35.3.

We now abate this cause and remand it to the 320th District Court of Potter County.

It is ordered that the judge of said court convene a hearing, after due notice to all parties,

to determine:

1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal;

2) whether appellant continues to be represented by Timothy Pirtle or whether

counsel for appellant has abandoned the appeal;

3) if appellant is not represented by counsel, whether appellant is indigent and,

therefore, is entitled to appointed counsel and a record of the trial court proceedings free

of charge.

We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law

addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to

pursue his appeal, is not represented by counsel and is indigent, we then further direct the

court to 1) appoint counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal, and 2) issue an order

requiring the preparation of a clerk's record in accordance with Rule 34.5 of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure. The name, address, phone number, fax number, and state

1 The court reporter has graciously offered to prepare the reporter’s record upon a request from this Court. Without knowing whether appellant wishes to continue his appeal, we must decline the reporter’s invitation.

2 bar number of any counsel who is appointed to represent appellant on appeal must also

be included in the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial

court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk's record containing the

findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders of the trial court issued as a result of

its hearing on this matter and 2) a reporter's record transcribing the evidence and

arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall

cause the supplemental records to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before February

26, 2007. Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may

request same on or before February 26, 2007.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dustin Lee Allen v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Dustin Lee Allen v. State (Dustin Lee Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.