Dustin Anthony Simmang v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 11, 2013·No. 03-11-00455-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 11, 2013

NO. 03-11-00455-CR

Dustin Anthony Simmang, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error requiring reversal in the trial

court’s judgments of conviction: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the

Court that the trial court’s judgments of conviction are in all things affirmed; and it appearing

that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made;

and that this decision be certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dustin Anthony Simmang v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Dustin Anthony Simmang v. State (Dustin Anthony Simmang v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.