Dust v. Conrod

Supreme Court of Virginia

Dust v. Conrod

5 Munf. 411, 5 Va. 411, 1817 Va. LEXIS 16

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedFebruary 8, 1817

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Munf. 411 (Dust v. Conrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dust v. Conrod, 5 Munf. 411, 5 Va. 411, 1817 Va. LEXIS 16 (Va. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

February 8th, 1817,

Judge Roane

pronounced the Court’s opinion.

The Decree is to be affirmed, so far as it dismisses the Bill as to M’Kewan, and to be reversed as to the residue, with the costs against Daniel Conrod; and the cause to be remanded, to enable the plaintiff, as standing in the place of Frederick Con-rod, to redeem the slave in question, after paying the debt comprized in the mortgage, and for the farther purpose of proceeding against the said Frederick Conrod, under his warranty of the slave aforesaid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

February 8th, 1817,

Judge Roane

pronounced the Court’s opinion.

The Decree is to be affirmed, so far as it dismisses the Bill as to M’Kewan, and to be reversed as to the residue, with the costs against Daniel Conrod; and the cause to be remanded, to enable the plaintiff, as standing in the place of Frederick Con-rod, to redeem the slave in question, after paying the debt comprized in the mortgage, and for the farther purpose of proceeding against the said Frederick Conrod, under his warranty of the slave aforesaid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Munf. 411, 5 Va. 411, 1817 Va. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dust-v-conrod-va-1817.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack