Dusenbury v. State
266 A.D. 889, 42 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5054
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 30, 1943·No. Claim No. 25817·Published
Opinion
[890]*890Crapser, Heffeman and Sehenek, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Bliss, J., dissent upon the ground that chapter 142 of the Laws of 1938 constituted a change in plans on the part of the State and under the contract claimant was entitled to receive the actual cost of the discarded plans.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dusenbury v. State, 266 A.D. 889, 42 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5054 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
266 A.D. 889 (Dusenbury v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.