Dusenbury v. Saunders

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 543
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 28, 1913
DocketNo. 13083
StatusPublished

This text of 88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 543 (Dusenbury v. Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dusenbury v. Saunders, 88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 543 (Ohio 1913).

Opinion

Judgment reversed for reasons stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed for error of the circuit court in modifying and affirming the judgment of the common pleas court. And coming now to render the judgment that should have been rendered by said circuit court, it is hereby ordered [544]*544and adjudged that the judgment of said court of common pleas be and the same is hereby reversed for error of said court in admitting in evidence, on behalf of the plaintiff, pages from the books of plaintiff purporting to show this account, and in reading therefrom; for error of said court in excluding the evidence offered by plaintiff in error touching the cost of material and the amount that had been added thereto for profits; and for error of said court in its charge to the jury as to the burden of proof.

Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dusenbury-v-saunders-ohio-1913.