Dusenberry v. Looker

Michigan Supreme Court

Dusenberry v. Looker

1 McGrath 1680, 3 Daily L.N. 289

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 30, 1896

DocketNo. 15504

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 1680 (Dusenberry v. Looker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dusenberry v. Looker, 1 McGrath 1680, 3 Daily L.N. 289 (Mich. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel the president and secretary of a corporation to issue the necessary notice to re-convene the stockholders’ meeting, for the purpose of holding an election in compliance with the minority law, 3 How. Stat., Sec. 1885a.

The circuit judge refused the application.

Affirmed June 30, 1896, with costs.

Held, that the duty sought to be imposed rests upon the directors themselves and not upon the officers named.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel the president and secretary of a corporation to issue the necessary notice to re-convene the stockholders’ meeting, for the purpose of holding an election in compliance with the minority law, 3 How. Stat., Sec. 1885a.

The circuit judge refused the application.

Affirmed June 30, 1896, with costs.

Held, that the duty sought to be imposed rests upon the directors themselves and not upon the officers named.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 1680, 3 Daily L.N. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dusenberry-v-looker-mich-1896.