Duschnik v. Deco Restaurants, Inc.
251 A.D. 791, 298 N.Y.S. 168, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7548
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Duschnik v. Deco Restaurants, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 A.D. 940 →
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Edgcomb and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and dismissal of the complaint. (The judgment awards plaintiff damages for personal injuries sustained by hand becoming caught in a meat grinder.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duschnik v. Deco Restaurants, Inc., 251 A.D. 791, 298 N.Y.S. 168, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7548 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
251 A.D. 791 (Duschnik v. Deco Restaurants, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.