Duryee v. Erie Railroad Company

Sixth Circuit

Duryee v. Erie Railroad Company

191 F.2d 855, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2640

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 1951

Docket11309

StatusPublished

This text of 191 F.2d 855 (Duryee v. Erie Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Duryee v. Erie Railroad Company, 191 F.2d 855, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2640 (6th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

191 F.2d 855

Peter DURYEE, Trustee of the Property of The New Jersey and
New York Railroad Company, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, John A. Hadden, C. E. Denney and
Robert E. Woodruff, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11309.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1951.

Stanley, Smoyer & Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Richard Swan Buell, New York City, for appellant.

Andrews, Hadden & Putnam, Cleveland, Ohio, John A. Hadden, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, t briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court. 91 F.Supp. 1009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI