Duryea v. Hendrickson
150 N.Y.S. 1084, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8755
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Duryea v. Hendrickson. Read the opinion of the Court — 175 A.D. 188 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 20, 1914·Published
Opinion
Order affirmed, with- $10 costs and disbursements. The lease to which defendant refers covers only lot 1713, and, without deciding whether the subsequent deed imposed the restriction, it is sufficient to justify the court’s discretion in granting the injunc-
tion that such lot has been united with other lots falling under the covenants. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 1084.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Duryea v. Hendrickson, 150 N.Y.S. 1084, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
150 N.Y.S. 1084 (Duryea v. Hendrickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.