Durst v. State
215 S.W. 221, 85 Tex. Crim. 609, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 502
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 11, 1919
DocketNo. 5410.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 215 S.W. 221 (Durst v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Durst v. State, 215 S.W. 221, 85 Tex. Crim. 609, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 502 (Tex. 1919).
Opinions
conviction was for assault and battery. The appeal must be dismissed for want of a sufficient recognizance. The statute requires the recognizance must set out in the face of it the amount of punishment assessed against appellant. This recognizance fails to do this.
The appeal, therefore, will be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hamlin v. Bryant
399 S.W.2d 572 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Culpepper v. State
172 S.W.2d 697 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Younger Bros., Inc. v. Turner
132 S.W.2d 632 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Morrow v. State
216 S.W. 1100 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
215 S.W. 221, 85 Tex. Crim. 609, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durst-v-state-texcrimapp-1919.