Durst v. State ex rel. Watmough
6 Ohio Law. Abs. 725
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Durst v. State ex rel. Watmough. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 Ohio St. 262 →
Opinion
HISTORY: — Rural school district dissolved and, on same day, new district created, including additional territory. Remonstrance filed. Board of education held remonstrance not sufficient as to signatures. Court of Appeals holds that remonstrance required to contain majority of all electors in each of three townships affected. Relator prosecutes error. Judgment affirmed.
. Reference to full opinion will appear in Omnibus Index of later date.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durst v. State ex rel. Watmough, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 725 (Ohio 1928).
6 Ohio Law. Abs. 725 (Durst v. State ex rel. Watmough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.