Durst Mfg. Co. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1030, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1892
United States Customs Court·Decided April 4, 1968·No. No. P68/192; protests 63/13693, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of strainers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), and that the strainers marked “A” are in chief value of brass and the strainers marked “B” are in chief value of zinc, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durst Mfg. Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1030, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1892 (cusc 1968).
60 Cust. Ct. 1030 (Durst Mfg. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davies, Turner & Co. v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 488 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)