Durst Manufacturing Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 868, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1956
United States Customs Court·Decided February 27, 1967·No. No. P67/48; protests 322461-K, etc. (New York); No. P67/49; protests 324444-K, etc. (New York); No. P67/50; protests 58/22050, etc. (New York); No. P67/51; protests 59/30307, etc. (New York); No. P67/52; protests 61/16211, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of strainers in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durst Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 868, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1956 (cusc 1967).
58 Cust. Ct. 868 (Durst Manufacturing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davies, Turner & Co. v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 488 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)