Durrence v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Durrence v. State

136 S.E. 112, 36 Ga. App. 218, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 884

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 14, 1926

Docket17706

StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 112 (Durrence v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Durrence v. State, 136 S.E. 112, 36 Ga. App. 218, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 884 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Lxjke, J.

There was ample evidence to authorize the conviction of the accused, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. Neither of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, the one assigning error upon an excerpt from the charge of the court, and the other based upon newly discovered evidence, requires a reversal. The defendant has had a legal trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lxjke, J.

There was ample evidence to authorize the conviction of the accused, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. Neither of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, the one assigning error upon an excerpt from the charge of the court, and the other based upon newly discovered evidence, requires a reversal. The defendant has had a legal trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E. 112, 36 Ga. App. 218, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durrence-v-state-gactapp-1926.