Durrell & A. v. Emery
9 A. 97, 64 N.H. 223
Opinion
There being no evidence of any contract, express or implied, between the plaintiffs and the defendant to pay for the occupation of the premises, or that the relation of landlord and tenant ever existed between them, the action cannot be maintained, and the motion for a nonsuit should have been granted.
Exception sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durrell & A. v. Emery, 9 A. 97, 64 N.H. 223 (N.H. 1886).
9 A. 97 (Durrell & A. v. Emery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.