Durrell & A. v. Emery

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Durrell & A. v. Emery

9 A. 97, 64 N.H. 223

DecidedDecember 5, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A. 97 (Durrell & A. v. Emery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Durrell & A. v. Emery, 9 A. 97, 64 N.H. 223 (N.H. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

*224 Clark, J.

There being no evidence of any contract, express or implied, between the plaintiffs and the defendant to pay for the occupation of the premises, or that the relation of landlord and tenant ever existed between them, the action cannot be maintained, and the motion for a nonsuit should have been granted.

Exception sustained.

Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*224 Clark, J.

There being no evidence of any contract, express or implied, between the plaintiffs and the defendant to pay for the occupation of the premises, or that the relation of landlord and tenant ever existed between them, the action cannot be maintained, and the motion for a nonsuit should have been granted.

Exception sustained.

Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A. 97, 64 N.H. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durrell-a-v-emery-nh-1886.