Durrant v. State
This text of 566 So. 2d 605 (Durrant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of conspiracy to traffic in cocaine in excess of 400 grams and sentenced to fifteen years in prison and ten years’ probation.
The state has conceded that appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted because there is no evidence in the record of any conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. The only evidence is that the entire scenario involved a rip-off by selling the intended victim a substance which was flour. Accordingly, the conviction of conspiracy to traffic in cocaine must be and is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
566 So. 2d 605, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7054, 1990 WL 133796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durrant-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.