Durrant v. State

566 So. 2d 605, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7054, 1990 WL 133796
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 19, 1990
DocketNo. 88-2663
StatusPublished

This text of 566 So. 2d 605 (Durrant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durrant v. State, 566 So. 2d 605, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7054, 1990 WL 133796 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of conspiracy to traffic in cocaine in excess of 400 grams and sentenced to fifteen years in prison and ten years’ probation.

The state has conceded that appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted because there is no evidence in the record of any conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. The only evidence is that the entire scenario involved a rip-off by selling the intended victim a substance which was flour. Accordingly, the conviction of conspiracy to traffic in cocaine must be and is reversed.

DOWNEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
566 So. 2d 605, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7054, 1990 WL 133796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durrant-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.