Durrant v. Hale
168 U.S. 705, 18 S. Ct. 942, 42 L. Ed. 1213, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1759
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 8, 1897
DocketNo. 429
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 168 U.S. 705 (Durrant v. Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Durrant v. Hale, 168 U.S. 705, 18 S. Ct. 942, 42 L. Ed. 1213, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1759 (1897).
Opinion
Einal order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516; Nordstrom v. Washington, 164 U. S. 705; Craemer v. Washington, 168 U. S. 124.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ebanks v. Hale
168 U.S. 707 (Supreme Court, 1897)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
168 U.S. 705, 18 S. Ct. 942, 42 L. Ed. 1213, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durrant-v-hale-scotus-1897.