Durrance v. State

923 So. 2d 516, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18722, 2005 WL 3159915
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 2005·No. No. 1D05-5019·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durrance v. State, 923 So. 2d 516, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18722, 2005 WL 3159915 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

923 So. 2d 516 (Durrance v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ROLLINS FRUIT COMPANY, INC. v. Wilson
923 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)