Durrance v. State

923 So. 2d 516, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18722, 2005 WL 3159915
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 18, 2005
DocketNo. 1D05-5019
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 923 So. 2d 516 (Durrance v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durrance v. State, 923 So. 2d 516, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18722, 2005 WL 3159915 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ROLLINS FRUIT COMPANY, INC. v. Wilson
923 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 So. 2d 516, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18722, 2005 WL 3159915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durrance-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.