Durr v. Principi

66 F. App'x 884
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJune 2, 2003
DocketNo. 02-7114
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 66 F. App'x 884 (Durr v. Principi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durr v. Principi, 66 F. App'x 884 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Opinion

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and to remand this case to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for further proceedings in light of our decision in Jaquay v. Principi, 304 F.3d 1276 (2002). The Secretary states that Luther N. Durr does not oppose.

The Secretary notes that in this case the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims relied in part on its previous decision in Jaquay. Because we subsequently reversed that court’s decision, the parties [885]*885seek a remand so that the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims can reconsider its decision in light of our decision.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary’s motion to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) is granted.

(2) The Secretary’s motion to remand is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Durr v. Nicholson
400 F.3d 1375 (Federal Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 F. App'x 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durr-v-principi-cafc-2003.