Durning v. Hastings

38 A. 627, 183 Pa. 210, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 741
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 8, 1897·No. Appeal, No. 62·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This record contains nothing that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications of error. The case was ably and correctly tried. It was clearly for the jury on the questions of fact presented by the evidence, and was submitted to them with full and adequate instructions, of which the defendant has no just reason to complain.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durning v. Hastings, 38 A. 627, 183 Pa. 210, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 741 (Pa. 1897).

38 A. 627 (Durning v. Hastings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fadgen v. Lenkner
365 A.2d 147 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Bockes
157 A. 214 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Commonwealth v. Tucci
13 Pa. D. & C. 366 (Schuylkill County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1929)
Spuhler v. Harbster
9 Pa. D. & C. 263 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1926)
Joseph v. Naylor
101 A. 846 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)