Durner v. Hood

207 N.C. 856
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 19, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Cueiam.

Affirmed on authority of Bell v. McCoin, 184 N. C., 117, 113 S. E., 561. Tbe cases of McRae v. Trust Co., 199 N. C., 714, 155 S. E., 614, Stanback v. Bank, 197 N. C., 292, 148 S. E., 313, and Anderson v. Wilkins, 142 N. C., 154, 55 S. E., 272, are also cited by petitioner as supporting in tendency tbe judgment.

Affirmed.

Schenck, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durner v. Hood, 207 N.C. 856 (N.C. 1934).

207 N.C. 856 (Durner v. Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacMillan v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.
20 S.E.2d 276 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)