Durner v. Hood

207 N.C. 856
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 19, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 207 N.C. 856 (Durner v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durner v. Hood, 207 N.C. 856 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Per Cueiam.

Affirmed on authority of Bell v. McCoin, 184 N. C., 117, 113 S. E., 561. Tbe cases of McRae v. Trust Co., 199 N. C., 714, 155 S. E., 614, Stanback v. Bank, 197 N. C., 292, 148 S. E., 313, and Anderson v. Wilkins, 142 N. C., 154, 55 S. E., 272, are also cited by petitioner as supporting in tendency tbe judgment.

Affirmed.

Schenck, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacMillan v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.
20 S.E.2d 276 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 N.C. 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durner-v-hood-nc-1934.