Durkee v. Phinney-Walker Co.
231 A.D. 746
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1930·Published
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Travis v. Knox Terpezone Co., 215 N. Y. 259), and upon proof of the-facts alleged in the complaint plaintiff would be entitled to recover the value of the stock at the time of demand for a transfer. (McIntyre v. Whitney, 139 App. Div. 557; affd., 201 N. Y. 526; 2 Sutherland Damages, p. 2320.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durkee v. Phinney-Walker Co., 231 A.D. 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
231 A.D. 746 (Durkee v. Phinney-Walker Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McIntyre v. . Whitney
94 N.E. 1001 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.
109 N.E. 250 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
McIntyre v. Whitney
139 A.D. 557 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)