Durkee v. Phinney-Walker Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Durkee v. Phinney-Walker Co.

231 A.D. 746

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D. 746 (Durkee v. Phinney-Walker Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Durkee v. Phinney-Walker Co., 231 A.D. 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Travis v. Knox Terpezone Co., 215 N. Y. 259), and upon proof of the-facts alleged in the complaint plaintiff would be entitled to recover the value of the stock at the time of demand for a transfer. (McIntyre v. Whitney, 139 App. Div. 557; affd., 201 N. Y. 526; 2 Sutherland Damages, p. 2320.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Travis v. Knox Terpezone Co., 215 N. Y. 259), and upon proof of the-facts alleged in the complaint plaintiff would be entitled to recover the value of the stock at the time of demand for a transfer. (McIntyre v. Whitney, 139 App. Div. 557; affd., 201 N. Y. 526; 2 Sutherland Damages, p. 2320.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D. 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durkee-v-phinney-walker-co-nyappdiv-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack