Durkee v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Durkee v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

667 S.W.2d 376, 11 Ark. App. 151, 1984 Ark. App. LEXIS 1519

CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas

DecidedApril 11, 1984

DocketCA 83-233

StatusPublished

This text of 667 S.W.2d 376 (Durkee v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Durkee v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 667 S.W.2d 376, 11 Ark. App. 151, 1984 Ark. App. LEXIS 1519 (Ark. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Donald L. Corbin, Judge.

This is an appeal from a Pulaski County Circuit Court decision affirming an Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board decision denying an application for an off-premises beer permit.

Appellant filed an application with the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board which was denied by the Board’s Director. On appeal, the Board was unable to reach a majority decision, voting two for reversal of the Director’s decision and two against, with one abstention. The Board then issued an order reinstating the Director’s decision, substituting different findings of fact for those of the Director. Appellant appealed the Board’s order to the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Second Division, which affirmed the Board’s action. We reverse and remand.

The circuit court’s decision is clearly erroneous. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 48-1302. la (Repl. 1977), specifically requires that “all action by the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board shall be by a majority vote of the full membership.” In this instance, a majority of the Board failed to either reverse or affirm the Director’s decision. There is no evidence in the record that a majority of the Board’s full membership took any action regarding appellant’s application. In the absence of a decision by a majority of the Board’s membership, there is nothing for the circuit court to review. Therefore, the Board’s decision which was reviewed by the circuit court was not a valid, appealable order.

We reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to reverse its decision and remand the matter to the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for consideration of the Director’s denial of appellant’s application and his findings of fact, pursuant to the provisions of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 48-1314 et. seq.

Reversed and remanded.

Cooper and Cracraft, JJ., agree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald L. Corbin, Judge.

This is an appeal from a Pulaski County Circuit Court decision affirming an Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board decision denying an application for an off-premises beer permit.

Appellant filed an application with the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board which was denied by the Board’s Director. On appeal, the Board was unable to reach a majority decision, voting two for reversal of the Director’s decision and two against, with one abstention. The Board then issued an order reinstating the Director’s decision, substituting different findings of fact for those of the Director. Appellant appealed the Board’s order to the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Second Division, which affirmed the Board’s action. We reverse and remand.

The circuit court’s decision is clearly erroneous. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 48-1302. la (Repl. 1977), specifically requires that “all action by the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board shall be by a majority vote of the full membership.” In this instance, a majority of the Board failed to either reverse or affirm the Director’s decision. There is no evidence in the record that a majority of the Board’s full membership took any action regarding appellant’s application. In the absence of a decision by a majority of the Board’s membership, there is nothing for the circuit court to review. Therefore, the Board’s decision which was reviewed by the circuit court was not a valid, appealable order.

We reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to reverse its decision and remand the matter to the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for consideration of the Director’s denial of appellant’s application and his findings of fact, pursuant to the provisions of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 48-1314 et. seq.

Reversed and remanded.

Cooper and Cracraft, JJ., agree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 S.W.2d 376, 11 Ark. App. 151, 1984 Ark. App. LEXIS 1519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durkee-v-arkansas-alcoholic-beverage-control-board-arkctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack