Durisseau, Quentin Allan

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 24, 2016
DocketWR-80,657-01
StatusPublished

This text of Durisseau, Quentin Allan (Durisseau, Quentin Allan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durisseau, Quentin Allan, (Tex. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-80,657-01

EX PARTE QUENTIN ALLAN DURISSEAU, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 11-DCR-056967 TH IN THE 434 DISTRICT COURT FROM FORT BEND COUNTY

Per curiam. Newell, J. not participating.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his due process rights were violated because a forensic scientist did

not follow accepted standards when analyzing evidence in his case. The trial court initially

recommended granting relief. On February 12, 2014, this Court remanded this application due to

its new opinion dealing with these types of cases in Ex parte Coty, 432 S.W.3d 341 (Tex. Crim. App.

2014). On August 26, 2014, the trial court signed findings of fact again recommending granting 2

relief. Those findings are not supported by the record.

The evidence in Applicant’s case was field tested by police and tested positive for the

controlled substance. The evidence was available for retesting in 2014 and again tested positive.

Given the amount of evidence found in his residence, Applicant received a low sentence pursuant

to the plea agreement. We find that although the initial lab report is given an inference of falsity,

the State has adequately rebutted that presumption and that Applicant has not shown the report was

material to his decision to plead guilty in this cause. Ex parte Coty, 432 S.W.3d 341 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2014); Ex parte Barnaby, 475 S.W.3d 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015). Therefore, based on this

Court’s independent review of the entire record, we deny relief.

Filed: February 24, 2016 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Coty, Leroy Edward
432 S.W.3d 341 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)
Ex parte Barnaby
475 S.W.3d 316 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Durisseau, Quentin Allan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durisseau-quentin-allan-texcrimapp-2016.