Durham v. United States
This text of Durham v. United States (Durham v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 17-cv-62355-BLOOM/Reid
WAYNE DURHAM,
Plaintiffs, v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant. ______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Reid (the “Report”). See ECF No. [23]. This action was previously referred to the Honorable Lisette M. Reid for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. See ECF Nos. [2], [12]. On December 1, 2017, Petitioner filed a Motion to Vacate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, attacking the constitutionality of his conviction and sentence for the unlawful possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e), and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). ECF No. [1] (“Motion to Vacate”). On October 9, 2019, Judge Reid issued the Report recommending that the Motion to Vacate be denied on the merits, final judgment be entered in favor of the Respondent, and that no certificate of appealability be issued. ECF No. [23], at 20. The Report advised that any objections to the Report’s findings were due within fourteen days of receipt of the Report. Id. at 21. To date, neither party has filed any objections, nor have they sought Case No. 17-cv-62355-BLOOM/Reid
an extension of time to do so. The Court has, nonetheless, conducted a de novo review of Judge Reid’s Report, the record and applicable law, and is otherwise fully advised. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review of the record and the Report, the Court finds Judge Reid’s Report to be well reasoned and correct, and the Court agrees with the its analysis. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Judge Reid’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. [23], is ADOPTED. 2. The Motion to Vacate, ECF No. [1], is DENIED. Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Respondent and no certificate of appealability shall be issued. 3. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and all deadlines are TERMINATED. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at Miami, Florida on October 30.2019.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: The Honorable Lisette M. Reid Counsel of Record Wayne Durham, Reg. No. 04599-104 Springfield Medical Center for Federal Prisoners Inmate Mail/Parcels Post Office Box 4000
Springfield, MO 65801
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Durham v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-united-states-flsd-2019.