Durham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Durham v. State

1934 OK CR 151, 39 P.2d 1119, 56 Okla. Crim. 325, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided December 14, 1934·No. No. A-8786.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Tulsa county of second degreej burglary and sentenced to serve seven years in the state penitentiary.

The record in this case has been carefully examined. We have no doubt of defendant’s guilt, and we find no material error.

Under the evidence, however, we find the maximum punishment is excessive.

The sentence is therefore reduced to four years.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Tulsa county of second degreej burglary and sentenced to serve seven years in the state penitentiary.

The record in this case has been carefully examined. We have no doubt of defendant’s guilt, and we find no material error.

Under the evidence, however, we find the maximum punishment is excessive.

The sentence is therefore reduced to four years.

Durham v. State, 1934 OK CR 151, 39 P.2d 1119, 56 Okla. Crim. 325, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97 (Okla. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

1934 OK CR 151 (Durham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.