Durham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Durham v. State

1934 OK CR 151, 39 P.2d 1119, 56 Okla. Crim. 325, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 14, 1934

DocketNo. A-8786.

StatusPublished

This text of 1934 OK CR 151 (Durham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Durham v. State, 1934 OK CR 151, 39 P.2d 1119, 56 Okla. Crim. 325, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97 (Okla. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Tulsa county of second degreej burglary and sentenced to serve seven years in the state penitentiary.

The record in this case has been carefully examined. We have no doubt of defendant’s guilt, and we find no material error.

Under the evidence, however, we find the maximum punishment is excessive.

The sentence is therefore reduced to four years.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Tulsa county of second degreej burglary and sentenced to serve seven years in the state penitentiary.

The record in this case has been carefully examined. We have no doubt of defendant’s guilt, and we find no material error.

Under the evidence, however, we find the maximum punishment is excessive.

The sentence is therefore reduced to four years.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1934 OK CR 151, 39 P.2d 1119, 56 Okla. Crim. 325, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-state-oklacrimapp-1934.