Durham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Durham v. State

1930 OK CR 184, 287 P. 1115, 47 Okla. Crim. 211, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 342

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided April 26, 1930·No. No. A-7302.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of burglary in the second degree in the district court of Jefferson county, and was sentenced to serve a term of two* years in the state penitentiary.

The appeal was lodged in this court in March, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. We have examined the record, and ivhile the evidence is circumstantial, it is sufficient to sustain the verdict and *212 judgment. No material error is apparent, and the punishment assessed is the minimum fixed by law.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of burglary in the second degree in the district court of Jefferson county, and was sentenced to serve a term of two* years in the state penitentiary.

The appeal was lodged in this court in March, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. We have examined the record, and ivhile the evidence is circumstantial, it is sufficient to sustain the verdict and *212 judgment. No material error is apparent, and the punishment assessed is the minimum fixed by law.

The case is affirmed.

Durham v. State, 1930 OK CR 184, 287 P. 1115, 47 Okla. Crim. 211, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 342 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 184 (Durham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.