Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Durham v. State

Durham v. State

111 S.E. 701, 28 Ga. App. 464, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 604
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 11, 1922
Docket13271
StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 701 (Durham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durham v. State, 111 S.E. 701, 28 Ga. App. 464, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 604 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Bloodwobth, J.

1. “ Prejudicial remarks of the court in the presence and hearing of the jury are not ground for a new trial unless a motion to declare a mistrial on that ground has been made and refused.” Harrison v. State, 20 Ga. App. 157 (6), 160 (6) (92 S. E. 970, 971), and cases cited. This ruling disposes of the special ground of the motion for a new trial.

2. The evidence amply authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. J. C. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error. Joseph M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrison v. State
92 S.E. 970 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 701, 28 Ga. App. 464, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-state-gactapp-1922.