Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Durham v. State

Durham v. State

100 S.E. 655, 24 Ga. App. 266, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 543
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 10, 1919
Docket10642
StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 655 (Durham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durham v. State, 100 S.E. 655, 24 Ga. App. 266, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 543 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial in this case contains the usual general grounds only; there is some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the judge who tried the ease, and this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Accusation of riot; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. May 5, 1919. Harris & Harris, for plaintiff in error. J. F. Kelly, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 655, 24 Ga. App. 266, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-state-gactapp-1919.