Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Durham v. State

Durham v. State

825 So. 2d 459, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10900, 2002 WL 1768976
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Durham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3533 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 2002·No. No. 5D01-2992·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hall v. State, 823 So.2d 757 (Fla.2002) (holding that in order to appeal the length of a sentence within the statutory maximum, a defendant must [460]*460argue that his sentence was the result of vindictiveness).

SHARP, W., HARRIS and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Durham v. State, 825 So. 2d 459, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10900, 2002 WL 1768976 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

825 So. 2d 459 (Durham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. State
823 So. 2d 757 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)