Durham v. State
683 So. 2d 679, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13244, 1996 WL 724228
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Durham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14825 →
Opinion
Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we remand this case to the trial court with directions to strike the three-year minimum mandatory sentence from count I of the [680]*680sentencing order. The charge did not allege that this defendant was in possession of a firearm at the time of the offense; there was no factual proffer during the plea colloquy that defendant possessed a firearm; and the minimum mandatory sentence was neither orally pronounced by the court nor was it part of the plea agreement with the State. Remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durham v. State, 683 So. 2d 679, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13244, 1996 WL 724228 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
683 So. 2d 679 (Durham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.