Durham v. State
This text of 512 So. 2d 283 (Durham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the defendant’s convictions for second degree murder with a firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a criminal offense. See Duest v. State, 462 So.2d 446, 448 (Fla.1985); Williams v. State, 438 So.2d 152, 153 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA), cause dismissed, 443 So.2d 981 (Fla.1983).
We reverse, however, the departure sentence imposed and remand the cause for resentencing within the guidelines’ range [284]*284of 17 to 22 years. See Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla.1986); State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986); McCray v. State, 503 So.2d 995 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Rackley v. State, 501 So.2d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 So. 2d 283, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2159, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.