Durham v. Page

79 S.E. 361, 13 Ga. App. 486, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 225
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 23, 1913
Docket4868
StatusPublished

This text of 79 S.E. 361 (Durham v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Durham v. Page, 79 S.E. 361, 13 Ga. App. 486, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 225 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Russell, J.

Where a bill of exceptions complains of the refusal of the judge of the superior court to sanction a petition for certiorari, and the petition is not set forth in the bill of exceptions, nor attached thereto as an exhibit, but is specified and sent up as a part of the record, no question is presented for decision by this court, and the writ of error must be dismissed. Where the judge of the superior court refuses to sanction the certiorari, the petition does not become a part of the record and can not be brought to this court as such. A petition for certiorari, if not sanctioned, is not a part of the record. Taylor v. Town of Omega, 12 Ga. App. 693 (78 S. E. 144), and citations.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Town of Omega
78 S.E. 144 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 S.E. 361, 13 Ga. App. 486, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-page-gactapp-1913.