Durham v. Paciera
165 So. 2d 486, 246 La. 596, 1964 La. LEXIS 2630
This text of 165 So. 2d 486 (Durham v. Paciera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Durham v. Paciera, 165 So. 2d 486, 246 La. 596, 1964 La. LEXIS 2630 (La. 1964).
Opinion
In re: Pete Durham, individually, and as the administrator of the estate of his son, Michael Durham, et al. Opinion of Court of Appeals, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, reported at 164 So.2d 188.
The application is denied. According to the facts of the case, as found by the Court of Appeal, the judgment complained of is correct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Liedtke v. Allstate Ins. Co.
405 So. 2d 859 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
165 So. 2d 486, 246 La. 596, 1964 La. LEXIS 2630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-paciera-la-1964.